When you add to that a complete departure from the absolutes of the Judeo-Christian values system, you have the seed to total moral anarchy. America is reaping the brokenness of this decay right now. Even sadder is their future agenda to solve the problems they help create. Their solution is worse than the problem.

This organization has led the way in making a mother's womb the most hazardous place for a human being in America. The dangers of neighborhood crime or natural disasters doesn't even compare with the threat from expectant mothers.

If any person on earth was created with the instinct to protect her responsibilities, it is a mother. She has a built-in mechanism that will react instantly when danger threatens her unborn. That instinct is so strong that the fear of death to the mother is not even considered.

The horrible monster of abortion has created a climate where these beautiful attributes of motherhood have been exchanged for the selfish option of pro-choice. The word "pro-choice" may sound more civilized than abortion but the killing is the same.

Dr. Bernard Nathanson was one of the leading abortionists in the western world. After his conversion to an anti-abortion view, he called Planned Parenthood "The Empire." He apparently did so because they preside over this "gas chamber" type treatment of unborn children.

The very founder of this organization, Margaret Higgins Sanger, was everything but a saint. It is reported that she became involved both sexually and intellectually (??) with a collection of social extremists. Her most intimate contacts were reported to be H.G. Wells, called "apostle of the new science", and Havelock Ellis, a promoter of a pseudo-science called eugenics. Eugenics advocated the stock breeding or "selective breeding" of the human race.

She became a racist. Upon returning to America, she championed the idea of sterilizing the so-called "unfit." Her "unfit" were Jews, Poles, Blacks and the poor and uneducated. She lumped them together as human weeds.

Her organization, Planned Parenthood, may appear more civilized than she but that's only the "P.R." and I mean "Public Relations" not "Parental Rights." They championed a Supreme Court case, "Planned Parenthood versus Danforth" (July 1, 1976) in which husbands and parents of minor girls lost any right of mutual consent to abortion.

In "Planned Parenthood" versus Bellotti (1980) parents were robbed of their right to be informed of their minor daughter's abortion, in some instances, at the discretion of the judge.

It's hard to believe that this organization could tout itself as "pro-family" when in fact they are one of America's most anti-family crowd. When they use the term "family", it is not likely to mean a man, his wife, and their children.

A prominent sociologist, Phillips Cutright, laid out the blueprint for Planned Parenthood's program for the 70's. This was his three-pronged approach:

1. Universal sex education in the schools.
2. A nationwide network of birth control clinics to distribute contraceptives to teenagers, and,
3. Legalized abortion as a backup.

He admitted that it would not solve the problem of teenage pregnancy and that in areas where contraceptives were available the problem would get worse. He even suggested that the real purpose was to overcome the "pseudomoral barriers."

If you will put those three words in a layman's language, it will spell immorality, homosexuality and free love. Their agenda is to have a society where the moral teaching of the Judeo-Christian faith is eliminated. If the world goes to the dogs in the meantime, at least they won't have any sex hang-ups. If America doesn't close this outfit down, we are fools.